AI Interactive 3D Digital Work Design

 Competition Overview

1.1  Name

【BRICS2025-ST-120】AI Interactive 3D Digital Work Design

1.2  Purpose

AI-interactive 3D digital work design is an innovative digital creation format integrating “generative AI technology,” “3D modeling and rendering,” and “intelligent interaction logic.” Its design process follows a closed loop of “demand-oriented AI collaborative creation – interaction implementation – iterative optimization,” significantly lowering the threshold for creating 3D digital works and enabling non-professional creators to generate high-quality models via AI. The AI-Interactive 3D Digital Work Design Skills Competition focuses on advanced technologies, comprehensive capabilities, and innovative thinking to build a closed-loop growth platform integrating “learning, practice, competition, and application” for participants.

1.3  Participants

1.3.1  Age Requirement

Participants must be over 16 years old and under 22 years old, with no gender restrictions.

1.3.2  Team Composition

Each team consists of 5 members: 2 competitors, 1 translator, 1 coach, and 1 team leader.

2  Competition Content

2.1　Competition Tasks

This competition is divided into 5 tasks, as follows:

Task One: Designated Task Development

Based on the scenario space environment provided by the competition organizer, complete the analysis of the scenario space environment design, create the scenario model using professional 3D modeling software; complete the model UV unwrapping, that the UV seams are hidden in non-visual focus areas, avoid texture stretching deformation, and control the UV utilization rate within a reasonable range; complete the scenario material setting and texture, and achieve the visual reproduction of the design.

Task Two: Integration of Interactive Scene Construction

Rationally plan the position, proportion and interactive relationship of 3D materials the scene space, and complete the preliminary integration of the scene; analyze the overall style and lighting environment of the scene, unify the material style in the scene, optimize the material, and enhance the overall visual effect; finally complete the entire virtual construction task.

Task Three: Three-dimensional Interactive Development

Arrange the interactive behavior, and determine no less 6 interactive points. Such as clicking the model to trigger, display information, switch scenes, etc.; use professional design software to complete the production of UI icons; use related software to complete the trigger response and interactive control of UI and 3D content; fully test the interactive function and optimize the user experience.

Task Four: Publish the WorkComplete the Web-side release of 3D digital interactive content, and ensure that it runs normally on the Web side.

Task Five: Work Display

Defend the progress the published work.

2.2　Score Weight Distribution

The score weight of each task module is shown in Table 1.

Table 1　Score Weight Distribution of Competition Tasks

2.3　Competition Duration

The duration of each task module is shown in Table 2.

Table 2　Duration of Competition Tasks

3　Evaluation Criteria

3.1　Evaluation Principles

3.1.1　Comprehensive Principle

The expert and referee teams evaluate results based on the principles of “fairness, impartiality, transparency, scientificity, and innovation,” covering design, equipment operation, and safe production.

3.1.2　Module Independence Principle

To ensure fair, accurate, and objective assessment, each module must be conducted and evaluated independently. Performance in one module must not affect subsequent modules. This ensures:

1. a) Independent assessment of specific skill areas;
2. b) Clear diagnosis of participants’ abilities per module;
3. c) Fair competition regardless of early outcomes;
4. d) Consistent evaluation standards.

Each module shall:

1. a) Provide a neutral, clean workspace;
2. b) Supply independent tools, materials, and data;
3. c) Include independent instructions and objectives;
4. d) Allow starting without relying on prior task outputs.

Evaluations must assess task-specific abilities within each module using predefined technical standards.

3.2　Distribution of Evaluation and Measurement Scores

The distribution of subjective (evaluation) and objective (measurement) scores is detailed in Table 3.

Table 3  Distribution of Evaluation and Measurement Scores

3.3　Evaluation Scores

Scoring Method: A panel of 4 referees (including 1 rotating referee who scores other teams) independently assigns weighted scores. The average of 3 valid scores is the final result. Score differences must ≤1 point; discrepancies >1 point require justification and consensus under the chief referee’s supervision.

Table 4  Weighted Evaluation Score Criteria

3.4　Measurement Scores

Scoring Method: Task-specific groups of 4 referees collectively determine a single score per task after consensus. Examples are shown in Table 5.

Table 5  Examples of Measurement Scoring

3.5　Evaluation Process

3.5.1　Result Scoring

Submitted works are scored against predefined technical standards.

3.5.2　Penalty Deductions

Participants will face deductions for the following violations:

1. a) Accidents due to improper operation: 10–15 points deducted; severe cases result in disqualification;
2. b) Equipment damage or environmental pollution due to rule violations: 5–10 points deducted; severe cases result in disqualification;
3. c) Disturbing order or interfering with referees: 5–10 points deducted; severe cases result in disqualification;
4. d) Non-compliance with regulations (e.g., messy tool placement, disorganized workflow, improper attire, incomplete documentation): 5–10 points deducted based on severity.

3.5.3　Sampling Review

The supervision team reviews ≥30% of scores. Discrepancies are reported to the expert leader in writing for correction and confirmation.

3.6　Score Tabulation

Scores are tabulated by module, combining process and post-event evaluations. Daily work is scored the same day. USB data is sealed and stored with the chief referee. Score sheets require all referees’ signatures before submission to the expert leader.

3.7　Ranking

Aggregate score ranking. In case of a tie in total score, compare the scores of Task One, the one with higher score ranks first. If the total are still tied, the ranking is determined in turn by the scores of Task One, Task Two, and Task Three.

3.8　Result Announcement

Results are announced at the closing ceremony.

3.9　Awards

3.9.1　Certificates

All teams receive certificates from the organizer.

3.9.2  Gold, Silver, Bronze Medals, and Merit Awards

Medals and prizes are awarded in accordance with the results of the competition. Teams from all countries are ranked together. For the competitors who place in the top in each event, gold, silver, and bronze medals as well as certificates are awarded accordingly. Winners other than the top six but among the top nine will be awarded prize medals certificates.

3.9.3　Other Awards

Certificates for referees/experts; “Outstanding Contribution Award” for key organizations; “Excellent Organization Award” for countries with active participation, pre-competition training, and no violations.

4　Technical Platform

4.1　AI-Interactive 3D Digital Work Design Platform

4.1.1　Computer Platform

Operating System: Windows 10 or higher

Browser: Chrome v122+ or Microsoft Edge v135+

4.1.2　Software Platform

Digital asset management and application platform;

Creative editing software: XR 3D Editor Digital Interactive Editor 2.0, Blender 4., Photoshop 2017, 3Ds Max 2020, Maya 2020, Rhino 6 and above;

General support software WPS 2019 and above or Office 2000 and above.

Figure1  Software interface

4.1.3　Software Features

XR 3D Editor 2.0 (a VR content development tool) includes:

Visual interaction editing: Drag-and-drop interface supporting no-code creation via modular assembly.

Multi-user collaborative editing: Real-time teamwork for enhanced efficiency.

Modular design: Built-in modules for object expansion/collapse, picture-in-picture, keyframe animation, and triggers for complex interaction logic.

Physics engine simulation: Gravity and collision effects for realistic virtual scenes.

Real-time data collection: Sensor-based operation data recording with AI analysis of skill mastery.

Cloud algorithm integration: Deploy data/algorithms to the cloud for improved performance.

Figure2  Software interface

‌

4.2　Report making generate format

Unified in PDF format.

5　Event Safety

5.1　Safety Training

The safety officer conducts mandatory safety training for all participants. Only those who pass the assessment may participate.

5.2　Safety Facilities

Venue requirements:
a) Safety barriers, emergency exits, fire-fighting equipment, safety operation guidelines, and evacuation signs;
b) Entrance security checks to prohibit unauthorized items.

5.3　Medical Equipment and Measures

Medical personnel, first-aid staff, emergency facilities, and response protocols must be available on-site.